Every certified H-1B Labor Condition Application discloses the worker's actual physical worksite — by law, not by choice. We matched that field directly against 200 Constitution Ave NW, the Frances Perkins Building, which is the Department of Labor's own dedicated headquarters — not a shared federal complex. The match returned 171 certified placements from 46 different staffing and IT firms since FY2020. We then ran the top repeat placers through USASpending.gov, the federal government's own contract transparency database, to see whether taxpayers can actually tell who's supplying this labor. Most of the time, they can't.
Every certified LCA (Form ETA-9035) is required to disclose the exact physical worksite address where the H-1B
employee will work — this is a mandatory field, not a voluntary disclosure, unlike the federal subcontracting
reports (FSRS) that are supposed to reveal who's really performing on a government contract but frequently don't.
We matched WORKSITE_ADDRESS1 across our local mirror of DOL's own LCA disclosure files (FY2020 through
FY2026 year-to-date) against 200 Constitution Ave NW, Washington, DC 20210 — the Frances Perkins
Building, DOL's dedicated headquarters. Unlike a typical federal office building, this address is not shared with
other agencies, which makes an address match here a clean signal rather than a coincidence.
For the top repeat placers identified this way, we separately searched USASpending.gov — using a broad keyword match against the company name, across every fiscal year on record and every federal agency, checked as both a prime awardee and (via the site's Subawards toggle) as a disclosed subcontractor — to see whether that company's presence at a federal worksite corresponds to any public contract record at all.
171 certified LCA filings match DOL's headquarters address since FY2020, from 46 distinct employers. The job titles are almost entirely software and systems work — Software Developers (103 combined), Systems Software Developers (20), Computer Systems Engineers/Architects (12), Network and Systems Administrators (5), Information Security Analysts (1) — consistent with staff-augmentation placements supporting DOL's internal IT operations, not policy or enforcement staff. 158 of 171 were certified (92.4%), 1 was denied, 7 withdrawn, 5 certified then withdrawn.
| Employer | LCAs at DOL HQ | Span |
|---|---|---|
| Raas Infotek LLC | 33 | 2020–2025 |
| Employer name not captured in source extract* | 30 | 2020–2021 |
| SREE Infotech LLC | 14 | Dec 2020 |
| Perspecta Enterprise Solutions LLC† | 13 | 2020 |
| PIR2 Consulting Incorporated | 5 | 2020–2022 |
| CybeCys, Inc. | 4 | 2019–2025 |
| Peraton Enterprise Solutions LLC† | 4 | 2023 |
| Astor & Sanders Corporation | 4 | 2021–2024 |
| TekCommands Inc. / Tekcommands, Inc.‡ | 6 | 2021–2025 |
| DVG Tech Solutions LLC | 3 | 2024 |
| Techwin Inc | 3 | 2022–2023 |
| 22nd Century Technologies, Inc. | 3 | 2019–2021 |
| Neo Prism Solutions LLC | 3 | 2020–2023 |
| Mejenta Systems, Inc | 3 | 2020–2024 |
| International Software Systems Inc | 3 | 2020–2022 |
| ...31 additional firms, 1–2 LCAs each | 40 | 2019–2026 |
* 30 rows carry a populated job title and point-of-contact title but a blank employer-name field — a parsing gap in this batch of our historical import, not a redaction. We're treating these as unresolved rather than attributing them to any company. † Perspecta Enterprise Solutions LLC was acquired by Peraton in 2021; these are very likely the same corporate entity operating under two names across different filing years, shown separately here because that's how each LCA was actually filed. ‡ Combined across two spellings of the same registered name appearing in DOL's own data. Placements continue into the current fiscal year — VAK IT Systems Inc filed again for a DOL HQ worksite in March 2026.
We took the seven biggest repeat placers from the table above and searched for each one in USASpending.gov — broadest possible net, every fiscal year, every federal agency, prime awards and disclosed subcontracts both. The question: does this company's presence inside a federal building correspond to a public record of a federal contract anywhere?
| Employer | LCAs at DOL HQ | USASpending Visibility | DOL/BLS Hit? | Federal $ Footprint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raas Infotek LLC | 33 | None | No | 2 PPP loans only (~$1.46M) |
| SREE Infotech LLC | 14 | None | No | 1 PPP loan (~$1.6M) |
| Perspecta / Peraton Enterprise Solutions LLC | 17 | Minimal | No | $0 obligated prime (USGS/Interior); $68K subaward (VA) |
| PIR2 Consulting Incorporated | 5 | None | No | 1 PPP loan (~$98K) |
| Astor & Sanders Corporation | 4 | Extensive | Yes — dozens | $100M+ across two decades; largest single order $47M (IRS) |
| CybeCys, Inc. | 4 | Traceable, wrong agency | No | ~$17.2M in disclosed subcontracts — to NIH, not DOL |
| VAK IT Systems Inc | 4 | None | No | 1 PPP loan (~$450K) |
Five of seven — including the single biggest placer at DOL headquarters, Raas Infotek LLC with 33 certified LCAs — have no prime contract, no disclosed subcontract, and no agency relationship of any kind on record in USASpending. Their only appearance in federal data at all is a Paycheck Protection Program loan from the 2020–21 pandemic relief program, which has nothing to do with the DOL placement. The two exceptions cut in opposite, equally instructive directions:
Two extensions of this method were tried and didn't hold up — worth reporting as negative results rather than leaving out:
This investigation is produced independently — one person, 23 years of data work, living on $1,419/month Social Security. If this work matters to you, a small donation makes a real difference.
♥ Donate via Square More Reports